The European Union (EU) United Kingdom opt to leave - also known as Proposed referendum on United Kingdom membership of the European Union - is a massive shift, memorable in the history of Europe. But the EU actually left relates to the Premier League? The answer is not substantially. While there are some major twists and perhaps a couple of ways.
The United Kingdom would have voted to leave, but do not run as trade agreements and the principles overnight. It could take two to 10 years to completely decouple EU - we are in uncharted territory here, which has never happened before, so it is a lot of speculation going on. One imagines that the Football Association and the Premier League is trying to keep things as they are, as long as you can.
Currently, membership of the EU or its milder cousin of the European Economic Area (EEA) obliged a country to four "pillars" of which is the free movement of workers. This simply means that all of the EU or EEA citizens can move to the other and to seek employment. Discrimination is suppressed by foreigners, provided they are EU or EEA.
If you are not from the EU or the EEA and will professionally to play in England, a work permit is required and must meet the criteria set for him. These have recently been updated, but in general, they should make sure that everyone who comes in, is a degree. (If you wrote this review article about these things like reading, attorney Daniel Geey sports.)
Therefore, in theory, when Britain left the EU, all non-British players have to go through the process a work permit. Some do not meet the criteria.
As?
That's when things get a little fuzzy. This article in The Guardian puts the number at 36, but under the old system of work permits. The message is supposedly more difficult, but, as shown in item Geey there are loopholes and exceptions. Even by a conservative estimate, we can have two or three guys at the club would not speak. And most likely they would be players sitting on the bench or in the stands.
It is a further problem. The vast majority of pro-Proposed referendum on United Kingdom membership of the European Union Field wants the UK to continue with duty-free trade with the EU under preferential conditions. That would mean that one or the other part of the EEA (in this case, it would still be to ensure freedom of movement, have) or negotiating an agreement that Britain could still impose strict immigration controls, while enjoying free -Trade.
The latter would be "realistic" for and in fact, sounds a bit like want you to have your cake and eat it too. Geey accepted ESPN FC said: "The United Kingdom would sign bilateral agreements with all countries and would be very difficult and time consuming" This is because, among other things, the United Kingdom would be. essentially saying: "We come home, but you can not reach us."
But suppose that's what happens. UK works somehow a deal to get the right parts of the EU membership, but also to work with restrictions. So what?
Well, that is if a work permit could be a problem for European players. Not much, as we have seen, but would some affected. But here's the thing: work permit regulations are not diabolical invented rules of faceless bureaucrats. They are written by the British Home Office, in cooperation with the Football Association, in the interest of the English game. If suddenly English football - and especially the Premier League - by being penalized in any significant way, imagines that can be rewritten. Or at least, we would much more "rubber-stamping" of the see "Panel exceptions."
So, what does this mean Proposed referendum on United Kingdom membership of the European Union not in the Premier League a role?
Instead of. Except maybe discussed for the other two aspects, which is not much.
One is underage gambling. Article 19 of the Regulations for the Status and Transfer of Players prohibits the transfer of minors, defined as players under 18 years there are three exceptions. A: Children who move for reasons other than football (as a parent to get a job in a new country); Two: teenagers living near a border; and three: the transfer of young people between 16 and 18 years within the EU or the EEA.
Obviously in the case of Proposed referendum on United Kingdom membership of the European Union, could not happen. This would mean that Manchester United do not have as Adnan Januzaj signed by Belgium or Timothy Fosu-Mensah Netherlands, or a day, Cesc Fabregas of Spain could not have left for Arsenal Barcelona.
Now, some European clubs - not only in the Premier League, but also elsewhere - taking advantage of a gap that it allows players to sign when they met 16 years, often with little or no compensation. This would be illegal.
given and the power of the Premier League, it is unlikely - - A different twist on it is that English football could establish limits on the number of foreigners per team again, as in the pre-Bosman era.
Currently players abroad (EU countries) limiting illegal under EU law because it constitutes discrimination on grounds of nationality. However, a post-Proposed referendum on United Kingdom membership of the European Union's Kingdom would not have these problems. Football Association could get minutes on the pitch and help the team to limit the number of foreigners to five, perhaps as a way English players (or less) per club.
This would have a major impact. Larger teams would smaller raids for the English players, including transfer values would rocket and small clubs down in the food chain in the championship and so on. But that would take a lot of assumptions about how the FA requiring that have the power to impose the in the Premier League. Frankly, it is unlikely.
So the bottom line is that if it can be fun to imagine the impact of the Proposed referendum on United Kingdom membership of the European Union in the Premier League, it is likely to be minimal, at least as high-level players are affected.
