This will be the thinnest silver lining for Jon Moss, Professor, which are previously little-known West Yorkshire on his head, but at least can be considered represented in a small role in the adaptation of life of Jamie Vardy as a screen are expected. It will only be the villain, of course, but it is better to be immortalized as a villain, be as not perpetuated.
Send Leicester stumbling striker against West Ham on the afternoon of offensive Sunday Moss, the dissemination of the visit of Swansea City this weekend and thanks finger Vardy, saliva reaction with stain release, probably, power on Claudio Ranieri side at Old Trafford next week , Vardy at the party, but he is the next two laps to pass the package must sit out.
Vardy two reservations (first failure so sweet marshmallow, the second for a clear dive) were just a part of what could be interpreted as a plea for writers. Moss meets all the requirements: the data of the contested decisions, especially the penalty that allowed Leicester to rescue a point, and the controversial decisions not given, especially pain that will not allow that knew Leicester to rescue a point.
So now a relatively harmless director of West Yorkshire spent two days as public enemy number 1 in the UK, also not come from the protection of human benefit, call the used colleagues. A horde of retired referees have the phalanx former players curse their power connected.
Whatever you think the standard of referees in the Premier League, it is difficult to argue that his treatment Moss late King of energy was not ugly and horrible. His failure as it was, had its roots in nothing more sinister than incompetence. Those on whom you probably do not have a bad day at work.
But the focus on mediation and Leicester raises an interesting question: Are the referee be in progress, the passionate romance of history Leicester?
In this discussion, we must establish certain truths. First, the referees are human. Also gave Slaven Bilić that; His grace is even more impressive after what had happened in Leicester.
"It's hard for him," the manager of West Ham, Moss said. "Here you have 32,000 people screaming at each contact in the area. If it is on the side of the house there is a penalty or handball. If it is in the other box is a swindler or a dive or for other reasons. Now it's easy, to say referees should not be affected on the paper of the fans., it is easy to say that. But in reality, the real life. "
Referees are sensitive to a variety of external influences. the amount of noise is one of them. There are a variety of scientific literature to support this claim: a 2003 study found that lot of noise, the number of fouls may increase assigned to the home team to 15.5 percent. A 2007 study suggested that all 10,000 people were in the crowd on the local computer in the value of 0.1 goals. The phenomenon even has a name psychological "impact of compliance." 40,000 people that say something that was not quite sure, a can is to be surprisingly convinced that it was probably failure.
The problem with studies of this kind is that it is difficult to see the signal in the noise. Take for instance the fact that remote computers conceded more penalties. Is it because the referees favor the home team, or because usually local teams are more aggressive and therefore likely to be in positions to win more sanctions?
A study published this year examined this distinction. Economics professor Andrew Picazo-Tadeo and his team named studied 2651 League games between 2002 and 2010, and noted that if the prices hardest by the umpires at home and teams of equal number of sins that can punish the sins Teams. This should, of course, for all fans good news: all this screaming and screeching games have a certain effect and fans operating real as 12 players.
However, the noise of the crowd is not the only phenomenon that has been found to have a subtle influence on the referee. Other factors - including a team or to the credibility of the player's previous decisions, and how the players handled the referee - can be divided into four categories are divided: the ability of the referee, his experience, his personal preferences and (this is interesting) " effects cyclical ". The latter group includes the noise of the crowd, to the reaction of the players and the rather large group of considerations "environment". This is where the Roman Leicester comes.
No one doubts that the world has fallen, and fallen hard for the history of Leicester. That does not mean they are armor to the game in a gloss or have the way to love to play it, does not mean you have to consider all of its players. This simply means they have done this season, but in the end, the imagination of people caught around the globe.
It is a story of another time, something that should not happen. It is the reason why journalists flocked from around the world to a small town in the East Midlands, why the New York Times a pronunciation guide for the American fans published that do not know the name, and why the office Mayor was besieged with interview requests.
So why the romance of Leicester is one of the external factors influencing the referee? I emphasize that I do not say that their integrity is compromised in any way, or want to win the Leicester referee. Far from it. But it is worth considering whether involved one of the many factors that make a referee, a second divided decision, the request is not to be the man of Happy End Leicester denies wrong.
There are a few weeks, I have this theory about Dermot Gallagher, a former elite. No, he said, a history of being such an influence; The referee these days receive intensive training to ensure that they can provide all the outside noise. This is also true: better trained the referee, the less influence such things.
But all the training she does not make flawless. These fractions of seconds when they have the decision limit balance (Leicester narrowly won against West Ham, for example), is infinitely more likely to find in favor of Leicester referee because they are slightly more likely aa vote for a local team? Or they go away and so anxious not seem to favor the Leicester team to be more difficult?
They are human, after all. They, like us. All imperfect players whose spirit is much more complex than you think, is to be allow the celluloid version of Jon Moss when its time to the film comes immortality
Rory Smith is a columnist for ESPN FC and The Times. Follow - on @RorySmithTimes Twitter.
No comments:
Post a Comment